Because we focus our practice on limited specific technical areas (e.g., automotive products, high tech products, pharmaceuticals and toxic substances), our knowledge of the technical issues arising in litigation regarding such areas is likewise extremely deep and well organized. For instance, we have exhaustive technical defense summaries for hazardous products litigation and for post crash fuel fed fire issues arising in automotive products litigation. Our existing technical knowledge can be repetitively utilized without costly payment for attorneys’ education.
We systematically review all Texas Supreme Court cases and applicable federal cases dealing with products liability law and exclusion of expert’s testimony, among other subjects, and continually update our summaries on these subjects. Starting with these totally unique exhaustive summaries we then tie much of what we do in with the summaries, leading to reduced time for billing personnel and cost efficiencies. Among other things, the following are tied into these exhaustive legal summaries: pleadings, deposition questions for adverse experts, motions to strike expert’s testimony, motions for summary judgment and briefs, motions in limine, motions for instructed verdict and proposed jury issues and instructions.
We utilize our extremely organized knowledge of substantive products liability law and expert exclusionary law at every stage of litigation to destroy our adversary’s experts and their technical case. This results in the most cost-effective disposition of the case for the client.
Our time efficiencies lead to significantly reduced hours for billing personnel and thus to significant cost reductions for the client without reducing the thoroughness, effectiveness or quality of the legal actions.
In many instances, our deep knowledge of the law and of the technical issues properly organized and argued can lead to very expeditious disposition of a case through voluntary dismissal, leveraged settlement at an unexpectedly low level, and granted motions to strike experts’ testimony, motions for summary judgment or other dispositive motions.